Classical argument outline

1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.

 

  I will start by making mention of epidemics, Ebola virus which causes serious atmosphere right now. Also, I will use example of international events held by DukSeong Women's University. And then, I will utter why host of international events made Korean citizens worried and furious. In the end, I will end the introduction by this thesis - The world should suspend all the international events and games if epidemic break out.

2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.

  I will explain exact definition of epidemics and infectious disease. And  history of international events that correlate with spread of  epidemics to support my thesis.    


3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.

  First, I will explain that many sources of infection all over the world are likely to spread out by moving internationally.Therefore, a large scale of movements of people and supplies would affect on spreading infectious disease. Second, I will insist that calming down people is important because
Lastly, I will describe the situation that the most of governments do not have any proper prevention for epidemics when it breaks out. And then I will conclude that in this situation it is reasonable to suspend or stop the international events.



4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.

I concede that if epidemics break out, the governments would take action for it. However, I will explain the situation that some governments are very passive about it even though whole citizens are worrying about them. I will insist that the government should do as the citizens want to. 

5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument, and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.

I will end my essay by providing my points again, and example of fatal epidemic which had really harmful effects on the world.